⚡️ Speed up method FunctionRanker.rank_functions by 13% in PR #384 (trace-and-optimize)#458
Closed
codeflash-ai[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
Conversation
…(`trace-and-optimize`) Here is an optimized rewrite of your `FunctionRanker` class. **Key speed optimizations applied:** 1. **Avoid repeated loading of function stats:** The original code reloads function stats for each function during ranking (`get_function_ttx_score()` is called per function and loads/returns). We prefetch stats once in `rank_functions()` and reuse them for all lookups. 2. **Inline and batch lookups:** We use a helper to batch compute scores directly via a pre-fetched `stats` dict. This removes per-call overhead from attribute access and creation of possible keys inside the hot loop. 3. **Minimal string operations:** We precompute the two possible key formats needed for lookup (file:qualified and file:function) for all items only ONCE, instead of per invocation. 4. **Skip list-comprehension in favor of tuple-unpacking:** Use generator expressions for lower overhead when building output. 5. **Fast path with `dict.get()` lookup:** Avoid redundant `if key in dict` by just trying `dict.get(key)`. 6. **Do not change signatures or behavior. Do not rename any classes or functions. All logging, ordering, functionality is preserved.** **Summary of performance impact:** - The stats are loaded only once, not per function. - String concatenations for keys are only performed twice per function (and not redundantly in both `rank_functions` and `get_function_ttx_score`). - All lookup and sorting logic remains as in the original so results will match, but runtime (especially for large lists) will be significantly better. - If you want, you could further optimize by memoizing scores with LRU cache, but with this design, dictionary operations are already the bottleneck, and this is the lowest-overhead idiomatic Python approach. - No imports, function names, or signatures are changed. Let me know if you need further GPU-based or numpy/pandas-style speedups!
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
⚡️ This pull request contains optimizations for PR #384
If you approve this dependent PR, these changes will be merged into the original PR branch
trace-and-optimize.📄 13% (0.13x) speedup for
FunctionRanker.rank_functionsincodeflash/benchmarking/function_ranker.py⏱️ Runtime :
1.84 milliseconds→1.62 milliseconds(best of67runs)📝 Explanation and details
Here is an optimized rewrite of your
FunctionRankerclass.Key speed optimizations applied:
Avoid repeated loading of function stats:
The original code reloads function stats for each function during ranking (
get_function_ttx_score()is called per function and loads/returns). We prefetch stats once inrank_functions()and reuse them for all lookups.Inline and batch lookups:
We use a helper to batch compute scores directly via a pre-fetched
statsdict. This removes per-call overhead from attribute access and creation of possible keys inside the hot loop.Minimal string operations:
We precompute the two possible key formats needed for lookup (file:qualified and file:function) for all items only ONCE, instead of per invocation.
Skip list-comprehension in favor of tuple-unpacking:
Use generator expressions for lower overhead when building output.
Fast path with
dict.get()lookup:Avoid redundant
if key in dictby just tryingdict.get(key).Do not change signatures or behavior.
Do not rename any classes or functions.
All logging, ordering, functionality is preserved.
Summary of performance impact:
rank_functionsandget_function_ttx_score).Let me know if you need further GPU-based or numpy/pandas-style speedups!
✅ Correctness verification report:
🌀 Generated Regression Tests and Runtime
To edit these changes
git checkout codeflash/optimize-pr384-2025-06-30T19.14.09and push.